dzٱԻ’s most inexperienced teachers are more likely to be found in disadvantaged areas than in schools in more affluent parts of the country.
The finding emerges from the Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa) data published today, which also shows that teachers in poorer areas are “much less likely”to be satisfied with their job.
Some 19 countries and economies that participated in Pisa2018 also distributed an optional questionnaire for teachers, which hasprovideddetailed information on teacher demographics, instruction, teaching strategies, teacher wellbeing and school contexts.
Pisa: Are the Scottish and English education systems less different than we thought?
Pisa in Scotland:Government hails ‘sharp rise in reading ability’ - but opponents point to ‘record-low results
More on Pisa:2018 results reveal a mixed picture for Scotland
Of those 19, there were eight wherethe proportion of teachers with fewerthan five years of experience was larger in disadvantaged schools than in advantaged schools.
Pisa: Teacher satisfaction
These were Scotland,Baku (Azerbaijan), Chile, the Dominican Republic, Morocco, Peru, Chinese Taipei and the United States.
The report in question - - also states ofthe results received from all 19 countries and economies: “Teachers who work in schools that serve predominantly disadvantaged students were much less likely to report being satisfied with their current job environmentthan those who work in more advantaged schools.”
However, the difference was “especially marked” in Scotland, Chile, Hong Kong, Chinese Taipei, Germany, Scotlandand the United States.
Only in Macao (China) and the United Arab Emirates did teachers in disadvantaged schools report greater satisfaction with their working conditions thanthose in advantaged schools.
The report states: “This aligns with the results of Pisa2015 indicating that teachers tend to be more satisfied with their job when they work in advantaged schools, even after accounting for school performance.”
In almost all countries, teachers in disadvantaged schools tended to report less positive feedback aboutmaintaining positive relations with students andclassroom management.
