Can you make these words into a story:

abstinence
potentate
inherent
felicitous
bolster
abstract
vindication
temperament
morbid
cynical
abstinence

My story:
King James vs King Charles 1:

King James was a potentate with an inherent felicitous temperament; that of a great ruler.
It bolstered his kingship at every turn; he acted royally and had a long effortless reign.
It was not abstract but on display everyday.
The vindication of this theory (that personality causes success as a monarch) is that his successor King Charles 1 who was morbid, cynical and favored abstinence but not kingly had a short, difficult tenure ending in disaster.

Simple Version:
King James was a leader with an inbuilt fitting character; that of a great ruler.
It supported his kingship at every turn; he acted royally and had a long effortless reign.
It was not hard to see but on display everyday.
The proof of this theory (that personality causes success as a monarch) is that his successor King Charles 1 who was grim, distrustful and favored self-denial but not kingly had a short, difficult tenure ending in disaster.