Vlog

Please consent to cookies to view content.

' ); iframeDoc.close(); } } } } } const observer = new MutationObserver(switchSrc); observer.observe(document.documentElement, { childList: true, subtree: true, }); })();

Vlog

Last updated

17 February 2026

pptx, 3.79 MB
pptx, 3.79 MB

History GCSE Medicine Edexcel KT2 L8 16 Marker Individuals Renaissance c1500–1700 (Fully Resourced).
This fully resourced lesson develops exam technique for the 16-mark judgement question, using Renaissance individuals such as Vesalius, Harvey, and Sydenham as case studies. No textbook required.

Lesson content (step by step):

Do Now / 5-a-day starter: quick recap questions on key Renaissance figures (Vesalius, Harvey, Sydenham) and their contributions.

Exam focus introduction: breakdown of what the 16-mark question requires (AO1 knowledge + AO2 analysis + a clear judgement). Teacher models how marks are awarded.

Question presentation: “The work of individuals was the main reason for progress in Renaissance medicine. How far do you agree?” Students identify keywords and stimulus points (e.g. Vesalius, Printing Press).

Planning task: pupils complete a scaffolded planning grid:

Agree arguments: e.g. Vesalius corrected Galen, Harvey proved circulation, Sydenham stressed observation.

Disagree arguments: e.g. Printing Press spread ideas, Reformation reduced Church power, Royal Society encouraged sharing.

Idea builder: class activity where students sort evidence into “Individual” vs “Other factor,” then decide which is stronger.

Model paragraphs: teacher provides one “agree” and one “disagree” paragraph annotated for structure (PEEL, evidence, judgement).

Essay writing task: students draft a full or partial 16-mark essay using sentence starters and success criteria provided.

Peer/self-assessment: pupils swap answers and use a feedback sheet (“Comment / Mark / Action”) linked directly to the Edexcel levels.

Plenary reflection: students write one sentence stating whether they think individuals or other factors were more important in driving Renaissance change, and why.

Reviews

Something went wrong, please try again later.

This resource hasn't been reviewed yet

To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it

to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions.
Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.