ÌÇÐÄVlog

Please consent to cookies to view content.

' ); iframeDoc.close(); } } } } } const observer = new MutationObserver(switchSrc); observer.observe(document.documentElement, { childList: true, subtree: true, }); })();

ÌÇÐÄVlog

Last updated

28 August 2021

docx, 13.93 KB
docx, 13.93 KB
pptx, 6.46 MB
pptx, 6.46 MB
docx, 11.96 KB
docx, 11.96 KB

A nice investigative lesson where pupils will consider how unfair or accurate the popular interpretation of Richard III is. This works best following the other WOTR lessons I have uploaded, as it will finish a chain of thinking about Richard III. Starts by looking at depictions of him, and proves he wasn’t a hunchback. So if that’s wrong - what else might be?

Word of warning: It will take a lot of discussion to help pupils remember they’re looking at if HISTORY has been ‘unfair’ or ‘accurate’, and not looking at whether each piece of EVIDENCE is ‘unfair’ or ‘accurate’.

If you choose to watch the documentary as part of a lesson, there’s also a sheet for pupils to fill in to collect evidence.

Reviews

Something went wrong, please try again later.

This resource hasn't been reviewed yet

To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it

to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions.
Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.