Vlog

Please consent to cookies to view content.

' ); iframeDoc.close(); } } } } } const observer = new MutationObserver(switchSrc); observer.observe(document.documentElement, { childList: true, subtree: true, }); })();

Vlog

Last updated

3 August 2026

pdf, 72.34 KB
pdf, 72.34 KB

A complete document-based question (DBQ) packet on the framing and ratification of the U.S. Constitution, built around one arguable question: Was the Constitution ratified on its merits, or on a promise?

Students work from six real primary sources spanning 1787 to 1791 - the Convention floor, the newspaper fight, an official act of ratification, and the vote counts themselves.

WHAT’S INCLUDED

  • One compelling question with a background essay that sets the context without answering it
  • Six curated public-domain primary sources: the Virginia Plan (1787), the New Jersey Plan with the Articles of Confederation voting rule it preserves, “Brutus” No. 1 (1787), The Federalist No. 51 (1788), the Massachusetts form of ratification with its recommended amendments (1788), and a data table of all thirteen state ratification votes with the First Congress’s 1789 transmittal and Amendment I
  • 18 scaffolded document-analysis questions, labeled by skill: sourcing, context, and close reading
  • 5 cross-document corroboration questions that make students read the sources against each other
  • An evidence-based writing prompt with a 4-point analytic rubric (16 points total)
  • A complete answer key with a target response for every question, plus two model thesis statements - one for each side
  • Teacher notes on the New Jersey Plan misconception, the disputed vote counts, and where to cut if you are short on time

WHY THIS ONE

  • It corrects a misconception most materials repeat. The New Jersey Plan contains no resolution proposing equal representation - it keeps the Articles’ Congress, which already gave each state one vote. Two questions are built on students discovering that
  • It includes a real data source. The ratification vote table lets students analyze margins, not just memorize an order - and the teacher notes flag where official sources disagree on two states
  • The question is genuinely open. The key includes strong model claims on both sides, so the rubric rewards the argument rather than the answer

FORMAT

  • Print-first PDF, US Letter, low-ink, no filled backgrounds
  • Answer key at the back, on its own pages
  • No prep, no logins, no devices - just print

GOOD FOR

  • A no-prep sub plan or emergency sub day in a US History or Civics classroom
  • Constitution Day, or the founding unit
  • Homeschool, hybrid, and remote settings

PAIRS WITH

  • The American Experiment video worksheets - episodes 4 and 5 cover the Convention and ratification, so the film carries the story while this packet carries the evidence

America’s 250th anniversary keeps founding-era documents in front of students all school year.

TERMS OF USE

  • For single-classroom / single-teacher use. Do not redistribute or post publicly.
  • © Response Resources. All rights reserved.

Reviews

Something went wrong, please try again later.

This resource hasn't been reviewed yet

To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it

to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions.
Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.